A Prospective Randomized Trial of Outpatient versus Inpatient Cardiac Catheterization

To evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient cardiac catheterization, we conducted a randomized trial at three hospitals of outpatient (n = 192) as compared with inpatient (n = 189) cardiac catheterization in low-risk patients. Outpatients had the following complication rates as compared with inpat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1988-11, Vol.319 (19), p.1251-1255
Hauptverfasser: Block, Peter C, Block, Elizabeth H, Ockene, Ira, Goldberg, Robert J, Butterly, John, Degon, Charlene, Beiser, Alexa, Colton, Theodore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient cardiac catheterization, we conducted a randomized trial at three hospitals of outpatient (n = 192) as compared with inpatient (n = 189) cardiac catheterization in low-risk patients. Outpatients had the following complication rates as compared with inpatients: hematoma, 12 versus 8.5 percent; numbness or weakness of extremity, 0.5 versus 1.6 percent; cold or blue extremity, 1.6 versus 1.1 percent; and acute myocardial infarction, 1.6 versus 0.5 percent. None of these differences were statistically significant. No deaths or strokes occurred in either group. Twenty-three patients (12 percent) assigned to the outpatient group required hospitalization because of complications of catheterization. In the outpatient group, the relative risk for hematoma was 1.42 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 2.29), and the relative risk for myocardial infarction within one week was 2.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 28.1). There were no significant differences between the two groups in whether they resumed normal activities or in the rates of rehospitalization within one week of the procedure. Total catheterization-related charges per patient were $679 lower for outpatients, with a savings in total hospital charges (including charges for subsequent therapeutic procedures) of $885 per patient. We conclude that elective cardiac catheterization as an outpatient procedure for selected patients is feasible and safe. Given the small size of our sample, however, we urge caution in interpreting these findings, since they do not exclude a small increase in complication rates with outpatient cardiac catheterization. (N Engl J Med 1988; 319:1251–5.) DIAGNOSTIC cardiac catheterization, including coronary arteriography, is performed more than 500,000 times a year in the United States. 1 Although it was formerly almost exclusively an inpatient procedure, technical improvements combined with an increased population of stable patients undergoing elective catheterization, efforts to control the lengths of inpatient hospital stays, the development of ambulatory care centers, and the emergence of free-standing cardiac-catheterization laboratories have prompted an evaluation of routine cardiac catheterization as an outpatient procedure. Several studies of outpatient cardiac catheterization have reported mortality and complication rates similar to those of historical inpatient studies. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Although several such studi
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM198811103191904