The Prognosis and Treatment of Stage I Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix

A review of 125 patients with stage I adenocarcinoma of the cervix is reported. The subtypes included endocervical (60), adenosquamous (38), papillary (15), clear cell (nine), and mucoid (three). The cumulative 5-year survival was 60%, and was significantly related to the followingtumor differentiat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1988-12, Vol.72 (6), p.915-921
Hauptverfasser: HOPKINS, MICHAEL P, SCHMIDT, ROBERT W, ROBERTS, JAMES A, MORLEY, GEORGE W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A review of 125 patients with stage I adenocarcinoma of the cervix is reported. The subtypes included endocervical (60), adenosquamous (38), papillary (15), clear cell (nine), and mucoid (three). The cumulative 5-year survival was 60%, and was significantly related to the followingtumor differentiation—well-differentiated 80%, moderately differentiated 69%, poorly differentiated 41%; lymph node status—nodes positive 28%, nodes negative 82%; the amount of residual disease present in the cervix after radical hysterectomy; and the interval from the previous pelvic examination. Survival was not significantly influenced by histologic subtype, patient age, number of positive lymph nodes, or tumor size beyond 3 cm. Treatment included radical hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radiation therapy, radiation therapy with hysterectomy, and hysterectomy followed by radiation therapy. The best cumulative 5-year survival (93%) was found in patients treated by radical hysterectomy without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, whereas the poorest survival (18%) was in those treated by standard hysterectomy followed by radiation therapy. Ovarian conservation seems to be an acceptable alternative to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in the young patient undergoing radical hysterectomy.
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X
DOI:10.1097/00006250-198812000-00022