A study of the human aortic valve orifice by transesophageal echocardiography
The transverse short-axis plane of the aortic valve was imaged by transesophageal echocardiography at a relatively high frame rate in 25 anesthetized patients undergoing heart surgery. The effective, time-averaged aortic valve area (a-AVA) was compared with areas obtained with triangular and circula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 1996, Vol.9 (5), p.668-674 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The transverse short-axis plane of the aortic valve was imaged by transesophageal echocardiography at a relatively high frame rate in 25 anesthetized patients undergoing heart surgery. The effective, time-averaged aortic valve area (a-AVA) was compared with areas obtained with triangular and circular valve orifice models (t-AVA and c-AVA, respectively). The aortic valve orifice was circular during 33.6% ± 17.5% of systole. The relations between the triangular or circular aortic valve areas and a-AVA were as follows: t-AVA = 1.04 × a-AVA − 0.14 (
r = 0.90; standard error of the estimate = 0.24 cm
2) and c-AVA = 1.37 × a-AVA + 0.00 (
r = 0.90; SEE = 0.30 cm
2). Bias analysis showed no significant difference between a-AVA and t-AVA (bias = −0.04 ± 0.23 cm
2; difference not significant) but a significant overestimation of the average valve area by c-AVA (bias = +0.88 ± 0.30 cm
2;
p < 0.001). Thus the aortic valve orifice was not circular for the entire duration of systole and valve area calculations based on a triangular model approximated a-AVA more closely than did those based on a circular model. These findings suggest that, for echocardiographic measurements that incorporate the aortic valve orifice area (e.g., stroke volume determinations), the use of a triangular valve area model, rather than a circular model, may produce more accurate results in anesthetized patients with heart disease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0894-7317 1097-6795 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0894-7317(96)90063-2 |