Differences in the responses to purinergic nerve stimulation and applied ATP in the guinea-pig vas deferens

The responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation and to applied ATP in the guinea-pig vas deferens were compared. Nifedipine (10 μ) markedly reduced the non-adrenergic neural contraction but only partially blocked the contractions produced by bath-applied ATP. Suramin (300 μM) also markedly reduced the contractile responses produced by nerve stimulation, but had no significant effect on the contractions produced by bath-applied ATP. Using intracellular recording techniques, nerve stimulation was shown to produce an excitatory junction potential which was abolished by suramin (1 μM). Ionophoretic application of ATP and bath-applied ATP also produced a depolarization. Suramin (1 μ) failed to abolish the response to bath-applied ATP and enhanced the ionophoretically induced depolarization. These results suggest either that ATP is not a transmitter in the vas deferens or that two classes of purinoceptor are present, one suramin-sensitive receptor which produces a contraction via the opening of voltage-dependent Ca z+ channels, and another which is suramin-resistant and produces a contraction by another means.