Volumetric flow estimation in vivo and in vitro using pulsed-Doppler ultrasound

The measurement of volumetric blood flow in small vessels in vitro and in vivo poses a significant technological challenge. In this study, two pulsatile flow models were developed, one with a 3.2-mm lumen diameter and one with a 12.7-mm lumen diameter, to assess the accuracy of volumetric flow estim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 1996, Vol.22 (5), p.591-603
Hauptverfasser: Holland, Christy K., Clancy, Michael J., Taylor, Kenneth J.W., Alderman, Jonathan L., Purushothaman, Kailasnath, McCauley, Thomas R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The measurement of volumetric blood flow in small vessels in vitro and in vivo poses a significant technological challenge. In this study, two pulsatile flow models were developed, one with a 3.2-mm lumen diameter and one with a 12.7-mm lumen diameter, to assess the accuracy of volumetric flow estimation of two pulsed-Doppler devices, a Crystal Biotech VF1 20-MHz system with either a cuff-mounted or a needlemounted probe and an Advanced Technology Laboratories Ultramark 9 High Definition Imaging ® system with a 5-MHz linear array transducer. The VF1 volumetric flow error was measured in the 3.2-mm phantom over a variety of pulsatile and continuous waveforms. The accuracy of the VF1 was also tested in porcine femoral and renal arteries. VF1 volumetric flow error ranged from 4.8% to 54.3% in the in vivo studies. The ATL demonstrated similar volumetric flow errors in the porcine femoral artery (∼3.2 mm diameter), but these errors were reduced to ≤ 17.4% in the 12.7-mm-diameter in vitro flow model.
ISSN:0301-5629
1879-291X
DOI:10.1016/0301-5629(96)00046-4