Volumetric flow estimation in vivo and in vitro using pulsed-Doppler ultrasound
The measurement of volumetric blood flow in small vessels in vitro and in vivo poses a significant technological challenge. In this study, two pulsatile flow models were developed, one with a 3.2-mm lumen diameter and one with a 12.7-mm lumen diameter, to assess the accuracy of volumetric flow estim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in medicine & biology 1996, Vol.22 (5), p.591-603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The measurement of volumetric blood flow in small vessels
in vitro and
in vivo poses a significant technological challenge. In this study, two pulsatile flow models were developed, one with a 3.2-mm lumen diameter and one with a 12.7-mm lumen diameter, to assess the accuracy of volumetric flow estimation of two pulsed-Doppler devices, a Crystal Biotech VF1 20-MHz system with either a cuff-mounted or a needlemounted probe and an Advanced Technology Laboratories Ultramark 9 High Definition Imaging
® system with a 5-MHz linear array transducer. The VF1 volumetric flow error was measured in the 3.2-mm phantom over a variety of pulsatile and continuous waveforms. The accuracy of the VF1 was also tested in porcine femoral and renal arteries. VF1 volumetric flow error ranged from 4.8% to 54.3% in the
in vivo studies. The ATL demonstrated similar volumetric flow errors in the porcine femoral artery (∼3.2 mm diameter), but these errors were reduced to ≤ 17.4% in the 12.7-mm-diameter
in vitro flow model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-5629 1879-291X |
DOI: | 10.1016/0301-5629(96)00046-4 |