An assessment of pain and return to normal activity : Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation. In a randomized prospective study transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 1996-10, Vol.10 (10), p.983-986
Hauptverfasser: FILIPI, C. J, GASTON-JOHANSSON, F, FITZGIBBONS, R. JR, GAINES, R. D, MCBRIDE, P. J, MURAYAMA, K, GERHARDT, J, CORNET, D. A, LUND, R. J, HIRAI, D, GRAHAM, R, PATIL, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation. In a randomized prospective study transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate. The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization. Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted.
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s004649900219