The Future of Computer-Assisted Investigation of the Polysomnogram: Sleep Microstructure

Previous attempts at automated analysis of sleep were mainly directed towards imitating the Rechtschaffen and Kales rules (RKR) in order to save scoring time and further objectify the procedure. RKR, however, do not take into consideration the sleep microstructure of REM, stage 2, and SWS. While the microstructure of stage 2 has been analyzed in the past decade, the microstructure of REM and SWS are virtually unknown. In stage 2 the amount and distribution of spindles, K complexes, and arousal reactions have been studied. At least two types of spindles (12/s and 14/s) with different dynamics and locations have been identified. Two different shapes for K complexes have been describedone related to external sensory stimuli with similarities to evoked potentials and another one more related to sinusoidal slow wave activity seen in SWS. These two different K complex shapes have different distributions and, obviously, different functions. The authors also suggest that one should differentiate between arousal reactions and true arousals. Recent investigations suggest two types of delta waves in SWS. The more sinusoidal 1-3/s delta waves with a frontal maximum are already seen with lower amplitude in late stage 2 and increase their amplitude and incidence towards stage 3 and Stage 4. The other delta-wave type is slower(