Evidence for limited validity of the revised global assessment of functioning scale
The study examined the concurrent validity of the revised Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, which is highly similar to the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) in DSM-IV and which is designed to measure patients' functioning and not their clinical symptoms. P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 1996-08, Vol.47 (8), p.864-866 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The study examined the concurrent validity of the revised Global
Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, which is highly similar to the
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) in DSM-IV and
which is designed to measure patients' functioning and not their clinical
symptoms. Psychiatrists used the revised GAF to rate 337 psychiatric
inpatients; the ratings were compared with nurses' ratings of the same
sample using Lehman's Quality of Life Scale. Ratings on the revised GAF
were most strongly correlated with ratings of clinical symptoms, not
functioning. Reliance on the GAF as the only tool to assess patients'
functioning may be problematic. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1075-2730 1557-9700 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ps.47.8.864 |