Platelet Anti-aggregant Activity of 2, 2-Dimethylthiazolidine Hydrochloride and 2-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazolidine

The characteristics of platelet anti-aggregant activity of 2, 2-dimethylthiazolidine hydrochloride (I) and 2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazolidin (II) have been evaluated. Compounds I and II were potent inhibitors of collagen- and arachidonic acid-induced aggregation of rat and rabbit platelets (I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin 1988/03/25, Vol.36(3), pp.1110-1116
Hauptverfasser: MIMURA, TSUTOMU, KOHAMA, YASUHIRO, KUWAHARA, SHIGEKI, YAMAMOTO, KOHJI, KOMIYAMA, YUTAKA, SATAKE, MIKIO, CHIBA, YOSHIYUKI, MIYASHITA, KAZUYUKI, TANAKA, TETSUAKI, IMANISHI, TAKESHI, IWATA, CHUZO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The characteristics of platelet anti-aggregant activity of 2, 2-dimethylthiazolidine hydrochloride (I) and 2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)thiazolidin (II) have been evaluated. Compounds I and II were potent inhibitors of collagen- and arachidonic acid-induced aggregation of rat and rabbit platelets (IC50 or IC100 values : 10-5-10-4 M), while they were less effective in the cases of adenosine 5'-diphosphate 2Na, A-23187 and labile aggregation-stimulating substance. Also, both compounds inhibited platelet shape change induced by a low concentation of arachidonic acid. Compounds I (100μM) and II (25μM) significantly inhibited serotonin release and thromboxane B2 formation induced by arachidonic acid in rabbit platelets. Compound I (100μM) inhibited prostaglandin I2 formation in rat aorta, but II (100μM) did not. In contrast, neither compound had any effect on platelet adhesiveness. These results strongly suggest that I and II prevented platelet aggregation, shape change and serotonin release reaction via their inhibitory effects on arachidonic acid metabolism of platelets, and the inhibiting potency of II was higher than that of I.
ISSN:0009-2363
1347-5223
DOI:10.1248/cpb.36.1110