Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials
Objective: To assess the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis in stroke. Design: A meta-analysis combined the reported randomized controlled trials of FES in stroke, using the effect of size method of Glass, and the DerSimonian-Laird Random Effects...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1996-06, Vol.77 (6), p.549-553 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To assess the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis in stroke.
Design: A meta-analysis combined the reported randomized controlled trials of FES in stroke, using the effect of size method of Glass, and the DerSimonian-Laird Random Effects Method for poling studies.
Setting: The included studies were published between 1978 and 1992. They were conducted in academic rehabilitation medicine settings.
Patients: In all included studies, patients were in poststroke rehabilitation. The mean time after stroke varied from 1.5 to 29.2 months.
Intervention: FES applied to a muscle or associated nerve in a hemiparetic extremity was compared to No FES.
Main Outcome Measure: Change in paretic muscle force of contraction following FES was compared to change without FES.
Results: For the four included studies, the mean effect size was .63 (95% Cl: .29, .98). This result was statistically significant (
p < .05).
Conclusion: Pooling from randomized trials supports FES as promoting recovery of muscle strength after stroke. This effect is statistically significant. There is a reasonable liklihood of clinical significance as well. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90293-2 |