Ketamine Blocks Currents Through Mammalian Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Channels by Interaction with Both the Open and the Closed State

Single channel recordings have shown that ketamine (Ket) decreases the open time of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel (nAChR).The present experiments on simultaneous openings of the nAChRs of mouse myotubes investigate the interaction of Ket with the open as well as with the closed state...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 1996-10, Vol.83 (4), p.830-836
Hauptverfasser: Scheller, Michaela, Bufler, Johannes, Hertle, Iris, Schneck, Hans J., Franke, Christian, Kochs, Eberhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Single channel recordings have shown that ketamine (Ket) decreases the open time of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel (nAChR).The present experiments on simultaneous openings of the nAChRs of mouse myotubes investigate the interaction of Ket with the open as well as with the closed state of the channels. The patch-clamp technique was used to record currents activated by 10 M acetylcholine (ACh) in the outside-out mode. ACh together with increasing concentrations of Ket was applied with a piezo-driven system. In a second protocol, the patches were preexposed to Ket before activation with ACh. With addition of Ket, the currents showed a biexponential decay, indicating an open-channel block. The peak current amplitude decreased reversibly and in a concentration-dependent manner. The rate constants of block (b+1) and of unblock (b-1) were modeled by computer simulation and were found to beb (+1) = 3 times 10 M/s, b-1 = 100/s. Preexposure of the patches to Ket revealed an additional block with a KD of approximately 2 times 10 M, which is below clinical concentrations. These data suggest that Ket also interacts with the closed state of the nAChR.(Anesth Analg 1996;83:830-6)
ISSN:0003-2999
1526-7598
DOI:10.1097/00000539-199610000-00031