Inter-stimulus interval in audiometry for neonates
The usual paradigm employed for both clinical and experimental evaluation of auditory responsiveness of newboms dictates that signal presentations be separated by a minimum of 15 s. Furthermore, this paradigm requires that there be 8 presentations of the signal and that two responses among the 8 tri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 1988-05, Vol.15 (2), p.173-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The usual paradigm employed for both clinical and experimental evaluation of auditory responsiveness of newboms dictates that signal presentations be separated by a minimum of 15 s. Furthermore, this paradigm requires that there be 8 presentations of the signal and that two responses among the 8 trials should be taken as normal responsiveness. Many have been concerned about accepting 25% as normal, and would prefer a paradigm that could lead to increased responsiveness. A procedure with inter-stimulus intervals longer than 15 s might be that paradigm. Therefore, the following experiment employed inter-stimulus intervals of 15, 30 and 60 s to examine responsiveness of infants young enough to be in a newborn nursery. Each infant received 24 signal presentations (8 with each of the 3 inter-stimulus intervals), and these were counter-balanced across babies. Although there is evidence of response habitation across time, there is also evidence that longer inter-stimulus intervals do lead to increased responsiveness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-5876 1872-8464 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0165-5876(88)90069-9 |