A Comparative Study of Thoracoscopic vs Open Removal of Benign Neurogenic Mediastinal Tumors

To assess the relative benefit of thoracoscopy vs open thoracotomy in the removal of benign neurogenic mediastinal tumors (BNMTs). Retrospective comparative study of thoracoscopy and open thoracotomy. Patients underwent surgery at the thoracic surgical services of two institutions from 1988 to 1994....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1996-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1461-1465
Hauptverfasser: Bousamra, Michael, Haasler, George B., Patterson, G. Alexander, Roper, Charles L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the relative benefit of thoracoscopy vs open thoracotomy in the removal of benign neurogenic mediastinal tumors (BNMTs). Retrospective comparative study of thoracoscopy and open thoracotomy. Patients underwent surgery at the thoracic surgical services of two institutions from 1988 to 1994. Patients who underwent thoracoscopy were operated on more recently, 1992 to 1994. Patients who had thoracotomies underwent resection from 1988 to 1992. All adult patients undergoing isolated removal of BNMTs at both institutions were included. Eleven patients underwent removal by posterolateral thoracotomy while six patients underwent thoracoscopic removal. BNMTs were removed by standard posterolateral thoracotomy or by three-hole thoracoscopic techniques with extension of incisions and conversion to an open procedure as necessary. Larger tumors were more difficult to remove thoracoscopically. Two cases of transient postoperative ptosis were noted among the patients who underwent thoracoscopy. Operative time was longer in the thoracoscopy group (171 vs 112 min; p
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1378/chest.109.6.1461