Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer : A comparison

After the first successful laparoscopic closure of a perforated peptic ulcer in 1990, 18 patients with laparoscopic closure were compared to 16 patients with conventional surgery. The endpoint adverse events (complications), pain intensity, operation time, fever, leucocytosis, and duration of hospit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Surgical endoscopy 1996-08, Vol.10 (8), p.831-836
Hauptverfasser:	MISEREZ, M, EYPASCH, E, SPANGENBERGER, W, LEFERING, R, TROIDL, H
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Duodenal Ulcer - complications Female Humans Laparoscopy - methods Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Peptic Ulcer Perforation - etiology Peptic Ulcer Perforation - surgery Postoperative Complications Retrospective Studies Stomach Ulcer - complications Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	After the first successful laparoscopic closure of a perforated peptic ulcer in 1990, 18 patients with laparoscopic closure were compared to 16 patients with conventional surgery. The endpoint adverse events (complications), pain intensity, operation time, fever, leucocytosis, and duration of hospital stay showed no clinically relevant differences. Consumption of analgesics was lower in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic closure of perforated peptic ulcer is technically feasible. The safety of the method and the benefit for the patient need proof by means of a randomized controlled trial.
ISSN:	0930-2794 1432-2218
DOI:	10.1007/BF00189544