Identification and catheter ablation of a zone of slow conduction in the reentrant circuit of ventricular tachycardia in humans

Three patients who had incessant ventricular tachycardia and in whom a zone of slow conduction was identified are presented. Each patient's tachycardia was refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic drugs and was being treated with amlodarone at the time of the electrophysiologic study. The ventricu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1988-04, Vol.11 (4), p.775-782
Hauptverfasser: Morady, Fred, Frank, Robert, Kou, William H, Tonet, Joelci L, Nelson, Steven D, Kounde, Semplice, De Buitleir, Michael, Fontaine, Guy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Three patients who had incessant ventricular tachycardia and in whom a zone of slow conduction was identified are presented. Each patient's tachycardia was refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic drugs and was being treated with amlodarone at the time of the electrophysiologic study. The ventricular tachycardia cycle length was 500 to 580 ms. In Patients 1 and 2, a single site at the posterolateral wall or low septum in the left ventricle was identified at which overdrive pacing during ventricular tachycardia resulted in ventricular capture with a stimulus to QRS interval of 280 to 400 ms and with little or no change in the configuration of the QRS complexes during pacing as compared with during ventricular tachycardia. In Patient 3, the same phenomenon was observed at two areas in the left ventricle: at the inferior wall, overdrive pacing during ventricular tachycardia resulted in a stimulus to QRS interval of 440 to 470 ms, whereas at the posterolateral wall, the stimulus to QRS interval was 320 to 360 ms. Transcatheter shocks of 100 to 240 J delivered at the pacing sites have been successful in preventing recurrences of ventricular tachycardia over a follow-up period of 10 to 11 months. These observations may be explained by the pacing site being located within a reentrant circuit in a zone of slow conduction bounded by inexcitable tissue between the pacing site and the exit site of the reentrant circuit. In Patient 3, the variable stimulus to QRS intervals are explained by variable proximity of the pacing sites within the slow conduction zone to the exit site of the reentrant circuit. The findings of this report demonstrate that it may be possible to identify a zone of slow conduction that is a critical component of the reentrant circuit of ventricular tachycardia. Initial results suggest that this slow conduction zone may be an ideal location to deliver transcatheter shocks for the purpose of ventricular tachycardia ablation.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(88)90211-2