Reassessment of nonplanimetric transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimates

To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of nonplanimetric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume estimates because inaccurate volume estimates may potentially undermine the value of serum prostatespecific antigen density (PSAD) in early prostate cancer detection. We prospectively evaluated 535 cons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1996-06, Vol.47 (6), p.857-862
Hauptverfasser: Bazinet, Michel, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Aprikian, Armen G., Trudel, Claude, Péloquin, François, Dessureault, Jean, Goyal, Michelle, Bégin, Louis R., Elhilali, Mostafa M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of nonplanimetric transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume estimates because inaccurate volume estimates may potentially undermine the value of serum prostatespecific antigen density (PSAD) in early prostate cancer detection. We prospectively evaluated 535 consecutive male patients with two consecutive volume determinations performed by the same ultrasonographer at the time of the same visit. Pearson correlation coefficients between two consecutive gland volume estimates ranged from 0.82 to 0.85 depending on the formula used; however, these correlation coefficients corresponded to an average 25% difference between the first and second gland volume estimates. Although two consecutive nonplanimetric TRUS volume estimates show statistically good correlation, clinically up to a 25% volume difference should be expected between two such volume estimates. In consequence, nonplanimetric TRUS volume estimates should be interpreted with caution, especially when used for PSAD calculation, in the early detection of prostate cancer.
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00068-4