Cancer of the low and middle rectum: Local and distant recurrences, and survival in 350 radically resected patients

The purpose of this study was to compare local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival rate in 350 patients with cancer of the middle and low rectum who underwent a radical abdominoperineal resection (APER) or a sphincter‐saving resection (SSR) in our Institute. There were 257 APER patients and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 1996-07, Vol.62 (3), p.207-213
Hauptverfasser: Bozzetti, Federico, Mariani, Luigi, Miceli, Rosalba, Doci, Roberto, Montalto, Fabrizio, Andreola, Salvatore, Gennari, Leandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to compare local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival rate in 350 patients with cancer of the middle and low rectum who underwent a radical abdominoperineal resection (APER) or a sphincter‐saving resection (SSR) in our Institute. There were 257 APER patients and 93 SSR patients, with a median follow‐up of 77 months. At 5 years, the estimates in APER and SSR patients were respectively 11% and 30% for the incidence of pelvic recurrence, 18% and 8% for the incidence of distant metastases, and 64% and 73% for overall survival. In the multivariate analysis it was found that Dukes' stage significantly affected pelvic recurrences, distant metastases rate and overall survival; histologic type affected only the pelvic recurrence rate. However, the final outcome of patients following APER or SSR was similar, suggesting that local failure per se does not affect long‐term survival. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199607)62:3<207::AID-JSO11>3.0.CO;2-3