Design and Development of Isocyanatoacrylates as Dental Adhesives

During the last 12 years, significant progress has been made in the development of dental adhesive systems. Some of the more promising systems are based on multifunctional structures that contain polymerizable vinyl double bonds and reactive isocyanate groups. The utility of compounds with such stru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dental research 1996-02, Vol.75 (2), p.761-767
Hauptverfasser: Chappelow, C.C., Byerley, T.J., Pinzino, C.S., Millich, F., Eick, J.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During the last 12 years, significant progress has been made in the development of dental adhesive systems. Some of the more promising systems are based on multifunctional structures that contain polymerizable vinyl double bonds and reactive isocyanate groups. The utility of compounds with such structures as adhesives arises in part because their isocyanate functionality is available for reaction independently, without compromising the reactivity of the vinyl groups. The hypotheses tested in this investigation were: (1) that the monomer reactivity ratios (r1, r2) for the free-radical-initiated copolymerization of ethyl a-isocyanatoacrylate (a-EIA) and 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate (IEM) with selected vinyl monomers can be determined; (2) that these reactivity ratios can be used to establish Q (reactivity) and e (polarity) values for a-EIA and IEM; and (3) that these reactivity parameters can be useful in designing copolymers with controlled compositions for dental adhesive applications. The free-radical copolymerization characteristics of a-EIA and IEM were studied. The isocyanate monomers were copolymerized at seven comonomer ratios with n-butyl acrylate (NBA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and styrene (STY). Reactivity ratios, r1 and r2, were calculated for each of the copolymer systems, giving: IEM (r1) = 0.38 and STY (r2) = 0.44; IEM (r1) = 1.19 and MMA (r2) = 0.84; IEM (r1) = 2.50 and NBA (r2) = 0.40; a-EIA (r1) = 2.20 and STY (r2) = 0.06; α-EIA (r1) = 7.00 and MMA (r2) = 0.10; and a-EIA (r1) = 23.50 and NBA (r2) = 0.04. The Q (reactivity) and e (polarity) values for IEM and a-EIA were calculated from r1 and r2 with use of the Alfrey-Price equations, giving, for IEM, Q = 0.89 and e = 0.60, and, for a-EIA, Q = 7.64 and e = 0.74. These reactivity parameters are useful for tailoring copolymers with controlled compositions and properties. Based on these calculated reactivity parameters, several copolymers of IEM [for example, IEM/2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)] are currently being prepared and evaluated as adhesives.
ISSN:0022-0345
1544-0591
DOI:10.1177/00220345960750020501