The Effect of Stabilization on the Onset of Neuromuscular Block When Assessed Using Accelerometry
Accelerometry is increasingly being used for neuromuscular monitoring.We sought to determine whether this system is sensitive to the period of stabilization of muscle twitch prior to the administration of neuromuscular relaxant. We recruited 20 patients. No premedication was given, and anesthesia wa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 1996-06, Vol.82 (6), p.1257-1260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Accelerometry is increasingly being used for neuromuscular monitoring.We sought to determine whether this system is sensitive to the period of stabilization of muscle twitch prior to the administration of neuromuscular relaxant. We recruited 20 patients. No premedication was given, and anesthesia was induced with propofol and alfentanil and maintained by a propofol infusion. An accelerometer was attached to each wrist. One of the ulnar nerves was stimulated for 20 min and the other for 3 min using a train-of-four pattern at 15-s intervals. Ten patients then received vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and a subsequent 10 received atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. The time to onset of maximum block was recorded. The data collected was subjected to a paired t-test with P < 0.05 taken as significant. The mean onset times for patients who received vecuronium was 148.5 s for the arms stabilized for 3 min and 151.5 s for the arms stabilized for 20 min, and in those who received atracurium it was 138.0 s and 130.5 s, respectively. We conclude that there is no significant difference in the onset of neuromuscular block with either vecuronium or atracurium after stabilization periods of 3 or 20 min when assessed by accelerometry.(Anesth Analg 1996;82:1257-60) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00027 |