Differential Regulation of Vitamin D Receptors in Clonal Populations of a Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cell Line
RWLeu4 is a chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line that is sensitive to the antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing actions of 1α,25(OH)2-vitamin D3(VD3). The JMRD3cell line is a VD3-resistant variant of RWLeu4 that was selected by continuous passage of RWLeu4 in the presence of VD3. The isol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental cell research 1996-05, Vol.225 (1), p.143-150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | RWLeu4 is a chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line that is sensitive to the antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing actions of 1α,25(OH)2-vitamin D3(VD3). The JMRD3cell line is a VD3-resistant variant of RWLeu4 that was selected by continuous passage of RWLeu4 in the presence of VD3. The isolation of a spontaneous VD3-resistant variant suggests that phenotypically different cells exist within the RWLeu4 cell population. Therefore, single-cell clones of RWLeu4 cells were isolated and characterized. Four clonal cell populations that fall into three groups differing in response to the antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing actions of VD3were examined. Surprisingly, the extent of response of the clones to VD3does not show a correlation with the basal level of the vitamin D receptor (VDR). RWLeu4-3 and RWLeu4-4 are the clones most sensitive to the antiproliferative actions of VD3(ED50≈ 1 nM); however, RWLeu4-3 expresses basal levels of VDRs similar to those found in the parental cells and the RWLeu4-2 clone, while in RWLeu4-4, VD3binding and VDR protein are below the limits of detection. Furthermore, RWLeu4-10 expresses the highest basal level of VDR protein but is relatively resistant to the antiproliferative actions of VD3(ED50≥ 30 nM). Like JMRD3, RWLeu4-10 is still capable of differentiating in response to VD3, as judged by the induction of biochemical processes and cell-surface antigen expression. Although VD3treatment increases VDR protein levels and DNA-binding activity in all clones, altered DNA–protein complexes are detected in RWLeu4-4. Our results suggest that sensitivity to the antiproliferative and differentiation-inducing actions of VD3is not dependent solely upon the level of VDR expressed, but may also require posttranslational modification of the VDR or complex interactions with other nuclear transcription factors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-4827 1090-2422 |
DOI: | 10.1006/excr.1996.0165 |