Myocardial Protection During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study with Trimetazidine

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the cardioprotective effects of trimetazidine (TMZ), an antiischemic drug, on left ventricular function using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Forty patients undergoing ele...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 1996-04, Vol.82 (4), p.712-718
Hauptverfasser: Vedrinne, Jean-Marc, Vedrinne, Catherine, Bompard, Dominique, Lehot, Jean-Jacques, Boissel, Jean-Pierre, Champsaur, Gerard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the cardioprotective effects of trimetazidine (TMZ), an antiischemic drug, on left ventricular function using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Forty patients undergoing elective CABG received either TMZ or a placebo (PCB). The primary measures of efficacy were serial measurements of fractional area change (FAC), percent of systolic wall thickening (SWT), and malonedialdehyde (MDA) production. The two groups were similar for the following variablesnumber of vessels revascularized (2.5 +/- 0.2 in the TMZ group and 2.8 +/- 0.1 in the PCB group), duration of aortic clamping (46 +/- 4 min in the TMZ group and 48 +/- 3 min in the PCB group), and bypass time (63 +/- 4 min in the TMZ group and 70 +/- 4 min in the PCB group). FAC increased by 12% in both groups 20 min after aortic unclamping (P < 0.05) and remained above the initial value at the sixth postoperative hour. SWT was 23.8% +/- 1.6%, 25.4% +/- 1.9%, then, 21.6% +/- 1.5% in the TMZ group and 22.8% +/- 1.6%, 23.8% +/- 1.4%, then 22.3% +/- 1.6% in the PCB group, after induction of anesthesia and 1 and 6 h after aortic unclamping (not significant). MDA increased by 24% in the PCB group and 25% in the TMZ group 20 min after aortic unclamping (P < 0.01). Lactate levels were lower in the TMZ group (P < 0.05) and patients from the TMZ group received less intravenous calcium before aortic clamping (P < 0.02) and less calcium channel entry blocking drugs in the early phase after aortic unclamping (P < 0.01) compared to the PCB group. We conclude that in patients with good preoperative ejection fraction undergoing CABG, TMZ as administered did not demonstrate clinically significant cardioprotective effects on left ventricular performance and lipid peroxidation compared to PCB.(Anesth Analg 1996;82:712-8)
ISSN:0003-2999
1526-7598
DOI:10.1097/00000539-199604000-00006