Randomized multicenter trial comparing synchronized and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates

OBJECTIVE: To compare synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) in neonates. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Level III neonatal intensive care units at six university or children's hospitals. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-seven infants receiving conventional IMV for respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, or meconium aspiration pneumonitis were randomly assigned at 7.5 ± 6 hours of age to either continue with IMV or change to SIMV. Infants assigned to each mode of ventilation had similar birth weight (BW), gestational age, and Apgar scores at birth, and similar oxygenation indexes at randomization. They received similar surfactant therapy and had similar incidence of sepsis, seizures, secondary pneumonia, and necrotizing enterocolitis. In the infants with BW less than 1000 gm, more infants receiving IMV had surgical ligation of their patent ductus arteriosus than did those receiving SIMV (27 vs 7%; p = 0.02). ANALYSIS: Data was analyzed overall for all infants and also separately within three BW groups: less than 1000 gm, 1000 to 2000 gm, and more than 2000 gm. The 1000 to 2000 gm BW group was further analyzed in subgroups weighing 1000 to 1499 gm and 1500 to 2000 gm. RESULTS: In all infants, at 1 hour after randomization, the infants receiving SIMV had a lower mean airway pressure than those receiving IMV (8.08 ± 2.15 vs 8.63 ± 2.59; p