Trust me, I'm a scientist: will urologists set a lead for geneticists to follow?

Raffle comments on some of the problems with medical screening, particularly in the area of prostate-specific-antigen screening. If clinical trials are not conducted, then there is really no point in screenings.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Lancet (British edition) 1996-03, Vol.347 (9005), p.883-884
1. Verfasser:	Raffle, A.E.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Bioethics Biological and medical sciences Clinical trials Diagnostic Tests, Routine Ethics, Medical Female Genetic Testing Humans Informed Consent Male Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Medical screening Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Prostate cancer Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - prevention & control Research Design Time Factors Tumors of the urinary system United Kingdom Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Raffle comments on some of the problems with medical screening, particularly in the area of prostate-specific-antigen screening. If clinical trials are not conducted, then there is really no point in screenings.
ISSN:	0140-6736 1474-547X
DOI:	10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91353-7