Anxiety and depressive symptom identification using the Duke Health Profile
Duke Health Profile (DUKE) subscales were compared for their ability to identify anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in 413 primary care patients. The seven-item Duke Anxiety-Depression Sca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 1996, Vol.49 (1), p.85-93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Duke Health Profile (DUKE) subscales were compared for their ability to identify anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured by the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in 413 primary care patients. The seven-item Duke Anxiety-Depression Scale (DUKE-AD) was the best symptom identifier, with sensitivities and specificities greater than 70% for high scores on both the SAI and CES-D. Also, baseline DUKE-AD scores predicted five clinical outcomes during an 18-month follow-up period, with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas ranging from 57.1 to 58.7%. Patients shown by DUKE-AD scores to be at high risk (>30, scale 0–100) for symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were more often women, less well-educated, not working, and with lower socioeconomic status. Their severity of illness was higher than that of low-risk patients. Although the providers did not know which patients were at high risk, they made a clinical diagnosis of anxiety or depression more often in high-risk patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00037-2 |