Do topical antibiotics provide improved prophylaxis against bacterial growth in the presence of polypropylene mesh?

Herniorrhaphies using a foreign body such as mesh can become infected. An experiment was performed in rabbits to compare three methods of antibiotic treatment to prevent the growth of bacteria in mesh-containing wounds. This experiment compared preoperative intravenous antibiotics (cefazolin), topic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 1996-04, Vol.171 (4), p.391-393
Hauptverfasser: Troy, Matthew G., Dong, Quan-Sheng, Dobrin, Philip B., Hecht, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Herniorrhaphies using a foreign body such as mesh can become infected. An experiment was performed in rabbits to compare three methods of antibiotic treatment to prevent the growth of bacteria in mesh-containing wounds. This experiment compared preoperative intravenous antibiotics (cefazolin), topical antibiotics applied intraoperatively (bacitracin), and their combination in preventing the quantitative growth of bacteria in a subcutaneous wound containing a polypropylene mesh inoculated with s. The bacteria were i. The bacteria were inoculated in doses sufficient to deliberately cause the growth of 130.0 ± 56.4 × 10 4 bacteria per gram of tissue in saline-treated control animals. Quantitative cultures of the mesh and surrounding tissues were obtained 5 days after insertion of the mesh and inoculation of the wound. Experimental data showed that treatment with systemic intravenous antibiotics, topical powdered antibiotics, or their combination all statistically significantly decreased the quantitative cultures grown from the inoculated tissues as compared with saline-treated controls ( P
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89616-X