The long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues impaired the implantation rate
To determine the efficacy and innocuousness of long-acting versus short-acting GnRH analogues (GnRH-a) in long protocol for in IVF-ET. Prospective randomized study. The IVF unit at an academic hospital. One hundred couples admitted for their first IVF-ET attempt. Serum concentrations of LH, E2, and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 1996-01, Vol.65 (1), p.122-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine the efficacy and innocuousness of long-acting versus short-acting GnRH analogues (GnRH-a) in long protocol for in IVF-ET.
Prospective randomized study.
The IVF unit at an academic hospital.
One hundred couples admitted for their first IVF-ET attempt.
Serum concentrations of LH, E2, and P during the all cycles and duration of pituitary desensitization were assessed, as well as fertilization rate, embryo quality, and implantation and pregnancy rates.
Significantly more days (10.8±1.8 versus 9.2±1.7days) of stimulation and more ampules of hMG (47±22 versus 33±16) were necessary to obtain similar numbers of embryos of quality with the long-acting GnRH-a. Implantation and delivery rates were significantly lower with the long-acting GnRH-a (32.8% versus 21.1%; 48.9% versus 29.1 %, respectively).
As the long-acting GnRH-a might interfere with the luteal phase and embryo development, short-acting GnRH-a should be preferred for ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF-ET. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58038-8 |