The long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues impaired the implantation rate

To determine the efficacy and innocuousness of long-acting versus short-acting GnRH analogues (GnRH-a) in long protocol for in IVF-ET. Prospective randomized study. The IVF unit at an academic hospital. One hundred couples admitted for their first IVF-ET attempt. Serum concentrations of LH, E2, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 1996-01, Vol.65 (1), p.122-126
Hauptverfasser: Devreker, Fabienne, Govaerts, Isabelle, Bertrand, Evelyne, Van den Bergh, Marc, Gervy, Catherine, Englert, Yvon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the efficacy and innocuousness of long-acting versus short-acting GnRH analogues (GnRH-a) in long protocol for in IVF-ET. Prospective randomized study. The IVF unit at an academic hospital. One hundred couples admitted for their first IVF-ET attempt. Serum concentrations of LH, E2, and P during the all cycles and duration of pituitary desensitization were assessed, as well as fertilization rate, embryo quality, and implantation and pregnancy rates. Significantly more days (10.8±1.8 versus 9.2±1.7days) of stimulation and more ampules of hMG (47±22 versus 33±16) were necessary to obtain similar numbers of embryos of quality with the long-acting GnRH-a. Implantation and delivery rates were significantly lower with the long-acting GnRH-a (32.8% versus 21.1%; 48.9% versus 29.1 %, respectively). As the long-acting GnRH-a might interfere with the luteal phase and embryo development, short-acting GnRH-a should be preferred for ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF-ET.
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58038-8