Thoracic outlet syndrome after motor vehicle accidents in a canadian pain clinic population
To record symptoms and signs, operative findings, and long-term outcome in operated and nonoperated patients with the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome after a motor vehicle accident. Descriptive prospective study. Pain clinic population in the Toronto Hospital (Western Division), Toronto, Ontar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Clinical journal of pain 1995-12, Vol.11 (4), p.316-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To record symptoms and signs, operative findings, and long-term outcome in operated and nonoperated patients with the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome after a motor vehicle accident.
Descriptive prospective study.
Pain clinic population in the Toronto Hospital (Western Division), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Thirty-two patients diagnosed as having thoracic outlet syndrome after injuries sustained in a car accident (based on specific symptoms and signs as well as exclusion of other disorders generating brachialgia).
Conservative management versus transaxillary or supraclavicular exploration of the thoracic outlet.
Pain/symptom relief.
Most patients presented with pain and paresthesiae, but conspicuous discoloration of the symptomatic extremity was seen in 41%. Osseous anomalies were seen in 22% of the patients in simple neck x-rays. Vascular studies were abnormal in 24% of tested patients. During transaxillary first rib resection in 15 patients, 87% were found to have musculotendinous and less often osseous anomalies compromising primarily the lower trunk of the brachial plexus. Long-term follow up demonstrated very good pain relief (based on patients' estimates) only in 47% of the operated patients and 20% of the conservatively treated patients. Reoperation was necessary in six cases through a supraclavicular decompression with only one patient experiencing substantial improvement with long-term follow-up. The difficulties in diagnosis as well as reasons for failures of conservative and surgical management are discussed, and the authors' current protocol for diagnosis and management is presented. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0749-8047 1536-5409 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00002508-199512000-00009 |