Stressor-associated alterations in porcine plasma prolactin
Experiments were conducted to determine effects of restraint and thermal stressors on plasma prolactin (PRL) in castrated male pigs. A single 20-min restraining period in a restraining cage which prevented both movement and injury increased (P less than 0.05) plasma PRL when applied at either 0800 o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) N.J.), 1987-12, Vol.186 (3), p.333-343 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Experiments were conducted to determine effects of restraint and thermal stressors on plasma prolactin (PRL) in castrated male pigs. A single 20-min restraining period in a restraining cage which prevented both movement and injury increased (P less than 0.05) plasma PRL when applied at either 0800 or 1600 hr. Exposure to 32 degrees C at 0800-1000 hr or at 1600-1800 hr produced more moderate increases (P less than 0.05). A combination of 20 min restraint and 2 hr at 32 degrees C produced a response similar to restraint alone. Twenty minutes after stressor application plasma PRL concentrations in pigs exposed to restraint or restraint +32 degrees C at 1600 h were greater (P less than 0.05) than concentrations measured in all other treatment groups at that time interval. However, there were no statistically significant differences in additional quantitative indices of the plasma PRL responses (maximal level, maximal change, or integrated response above basal levels) among restraint, 32 degrees C, or restraint +32 degrees C, nor between morning and afternoon applications of treatment. Such data do not provide, therefore, any strong evidence for stressor-dependent or circadian differences in plasma PRL response. A second study subjected castrated male pigs to 20 degrees C (controls), 20 +/- 12 degrees C (cyclic temperature, sine wave variation), 5 degrees C constant, and 5 +/- 12 degrees C cyclic for 20 days. After 6 days exposure to 5 degrees C constant or 5 +/- 12 degrees C cyclic there were decreases (P less than 0.05) of 59 and 67% respectively in plasma PRL when compared either with pretreatment levels or with levels in pigs at 20 or 20 +/- 12 degrees C. There were no differences in PRL responses between cyclic vs constant temperatures. These results are the first to indicate that plasma PRL in pigs is affected by acute restraint and thermal stressors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0037-9727 1535-3702 1525-1373 1535-3699 |
DOI: | 10.3181/00379727-186-42622 |