Operator variability in disease detection and grading by colposcopy in patients with mild dysplastic smears

Background. To determine interoperator variability in the colposcopic evaluation of patients with mild dysplastic smears, retrospective comparison of colposcopy and biopsy results in 856 patients examined by 11 colposcopists in the Outpatient Colposcopy Clinic of “L. Mangiagalli” Institute, Milano,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1995-11, Vol.76 (9), p.1601-1605
Hauptverfasser: Sideri, Mario, Schettino, Francesco, Spinaci, Laura, Spolti, Noemi, Crosignani, Piergiorgio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. To determine interoperator variability in the colposcopic evaluation of patients with mild dysplastic smears, retrospective comparison of colposcopy and biopsy results in 856 patients examined by 11 colposcopists in the Outpatient Colposcopy Clinic of “L. Mangiagalli” Institute, Milano, was performed. Methods. The patients underwent a complete colposcopic assessment and target biopsy on suspect areas if a screening smear showed mild dysplasia. Colposcopic findings and disease detection rate for each operator were compared. Results. There was no significant (P> 0.05) difference in the recording of abnormal colposcopic findings. Significant differences were found, however, in abnormal transformation zone grading (P < 0.001), biopsy rate (P < 0.05), and squamocolumnar junction visualization (P < 0.005). There was no significant difference in overall disease detection (P> 0.5) but there was a statistically significant, inverse relation (r =–0.6, P < 0.01) between the high grade (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3) and low grade (human papillomavirus/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1) detection rate for each operator. Conclusions. High grade disease detection in patients with mild dysplastic smears is influenced the subjectivity of the colposcopic examination. This should be considered when planning optimal management for patients with mild dysplasia. Cancer 1995; 76:1601–5.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19951101)76:9<1601::AID-CNCR2820760916>3.0.CO;2-Z