Randomized trial of ceftazidime versus placebo in the management of acute respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis
A randomized trial of ceftazidime versus placebo was conducted in patients with cystic fibrosis hospitalized for acute respiratory exacerbations. Patients 12 years of age or older were included if they had mild to moderately severe illness according to the following criteria: erythrocyte sedimentati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of pediatrics 1987-12, Vol.111 (6), p.907-913 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A randomized trial of ceftazidime versus placebo was conducted in patients with cystic fibrosis hospitalized for acute respiratory exacerbations. Patients 12 years of age or older were included if they had mild to moderately severe illness according to the following criteria: erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≤50 mm/hr and less than three other abnormalities (leukocyte count ≥15,000/μL, pulse≥100 beats/min, respirations ≥30/min, or temperature ≥38.5°C). In all 16 episodes treated with ceftazidime, the patients were rated improved in comparison with 10 of 12 patients treated with placebo. Three placebo-treated patients dropped out of the study within 3 to 5 days because they wanted antibiotic therapy. None of the 15 placebo-treated patients showed clinical deterioration. There were no significant differences in rate of improvement of symptom score, weight gain, or pulmonary function between the two treatment groups. There was no difference in the course during the 6 to 24 months after the study period. Intravenous antibiotics are not essential in the management of all acute respiratory exacerbations of mild to moderate severity in patients with cystic fibrosis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3476 1097-6833 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80217-2 |