PBK modeling for metals. Examples with lead, uranium, and chromium
Physiologically-based models for metals differ in several key respects from models for organic compounds. Although sequestration by binding to specific metal-binding proteins in liver, kidney, and red cell may be important, neither the magnitude and pattern of metabolism nor potential accumulation i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicology letters 1995-12, Vol.82, p.367-372 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Physiologically-based models for metals differ in several key respects from models for organic compounds. Although sequestration by binding to specific metal-binding proteins in liver, kidney, and red cell may be important, neither the magnitude and pattern of metabolism nor potential accumulation in fat is a component of models of metal kinetics. In addition, the long residence times of bone-seeking elements require that bone turnover and metabolism be incorporated into physiologically-based models for these elements. Three mechanisms (rapid exchange at bone/blood interfaces, trapping or incorporation with forming bone and loss with resorbing bone, and slow exchange throughout the total bone volume) are potentially important in the overall interchange of bone-seeking elements between blood and bone. Three examples are given of applications of physiologically-based kinetic models for the bone-seeking elements lead, chromium, and uranium to assist in answering practical questions relating to bioavailability, distribution, and data interpretation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-4274 1879-3169 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03567-2 |