Black women have smaller abdominal girths than white women of the same relative weight

Anthropometric measurements were compared in 312 white and 242 black women (mean age 54) who were participants in the Charleston Heart Study. Body mass index (BMI) was greater in black women (27.8 kg/M2) than in white women (24.7 kg/M 2) as were body circumferences. However, when the girth measureme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 1994-05, Vol.47 (5), p.495-499
Hauptverfasser: Stevens, J., Plankey, M.W., Keil, J.E., Rust, P.F., Tyroler, H.A., Davis, C.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Anthropometric measurements were compared in 312 white and 242 black women (mean age 54) who were participants in the Charleston Heart Study. Body mass index (BMI) was greater in black women (27.8 kg/M2) than in white women (24.7 kg/M 2) as were body circumferences. However, when the girth measurements were adjusted for BMI, some racial differences were reversed. Age, smoking and BMI-adjusted abdominal girth was smaller in the black women than in the white women (88.9 cm vs 92.2 cm). The ratio of abdomen to midarm circumference was larger in white women than black women (3.24 vs 3.09), and could be interpreted to indicate a less central fat pattern in the black women. This conclusion should be viewed with caution since circumference measurements, though often used in epidemiologic research, do not differentiate between subcutaneous fat and visceral fat.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(94)90296-8