Doppler determined aortic acceleration after dipyridamole in the prediction of coronary artery disease
Change in the acceleration of aortic blood flow with stress testing is reported to reflect the presence of myocardial ischaemia. We studied its clinical usefulness when compared with dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy in 101 patients, of whom 64 had coronary angiography. Maximum aortic acceleration...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cardiology 1995-08, Vol.51 (1), p.5-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Change in the acceleration of aortic blood flow with stress testing is reported to reflect the presence of myocardial ischaemia. We studied its clinical usefulness when compared with dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy in 101 patients, of whom 64 had coronary angiography. Maximum aortic acceleration increased after dipyridamole (
P < 0.0001), although no correlation existed between the aortic acceleration and evidence of thallium perfusion abnormalities. For the patients who had angiography, the increase in aortic acceleration was similar for those with no significant coronary stenoses, single vessel or multi-vessel disease. Compared with coronary angiography, Doppler measurement of maximum aortic acceleration had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 37% for the detection of coronary artery disease. When patients with previous myocardial infarction or left ventricular dysfunction were excluded, there was still no relationship between the maximum aortic acceleration and the presence of coronary artery disease. We conclude that changes in the acceleration of aortic blood flow after dipyridamole stressing do not predict the presence or severity of coronary artery disease as measured from perfusion defects at thallium scintigraphy or by coronary angiography. We have observed a wide variability of aortic maximum acceleration in the evaluation of myocardial ischaemia, which we feel introduces serious limitations to its use in routine clinical practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-5273 1874-1754 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0167-5273(95)02374-6 |