Cost analysis of propofol versus thiopental induction anesthesia in outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery

This study investigated the cost of propofol versus thiopental anesthesia in 243 patients who underwent outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Patient records were analyzed for medication use, duration of surgery, anesthesia, recovery room stay, and associated costs. Despite the higher drug co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 1995-07, Vol.17 (4), p.770-776
Hauptverfasser: Wagner, Bertil K.J., O'Hara, Dorene A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigated the cost of propofol versus thiopental anesthesia in 243 patients who underwent outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Patient records were analyzed for medication use, duration of surgery, anesthesia, recovery room stay, and associated costs. Despite the higher drug cost for propofol, the total mean cost was $273.00 less per patient for patients receiving propofol induction anesthesia. Extension of these data translates into cost savings of approximately $7900.00 if propofol had been used for all patients. Although the duration of surgery for the propofol group was shorter by nearly 12 minutes, the anesthesia duration and recovery room stay were both longer for the thiopental group, reflecting the longer duration of action of thiopental. Although the realized cost savings of drugs, surgery, anesthesia, and recovery time when propofol versus thiopental is used for outpatient laparoscopic gynecologic surgery are relatively small on an individual patient basis, cost savings may become more significant if larger patient populations are studied.
ISSN:0149-2918
1879-114X
DOI:10.1016/0149-2918(95)80053-0