Development and evaluation of a non-isotopically labeled DNA probe for the diagnosis of infectious laryngotracheitis
A digoxigenin-labeled cloned infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) DNA fragment was evaluated as a nonradioactive alternative probe in the diagnosis of infectious laryngotracheitis. The dot-blot hybridization protocol was optimized and was capable of detecting 40 pg of purified ILTV DNA and as f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Avian diseases 1994-07, Vol.38 (3), p.467-474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A digoxigenin-labeled cloned infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) DNA fragment was evaluated as a nonradioactive alternative probe in the diagnosis of infectious laryngotracheitis. The dot-blot hybridization protocol was optimized and was capable of detecting 40 pg of purified ILTV DNA and as few as 50 ILTV-infected chicken embryo liver cells. The utility of this approach for diagnostic use was evaluated through four ILTV inoculation trials using a mild field isolate, a virulent challenge strain, a tissue-culture-origin vaccine, and an egg-origin vaccine. Birds were examined for clinical signs of ILT, and conjunctival and pharyngeal swabs from inoculated and sentinel birds were tested for ILTV by the digoxigenin-labeled probe and by virus isolation. In general, higher numbers of ILTV positive samples were detected by both assays from conjunctival swabs. For the non-vaccine strains, detection by dot-blot hybridization was equivalent to that for virus isolation However, for the two vaccine strains, there was some lack of correlation between the dot-blot results and the virus-isolation results. The kappa values between virus-isolation results and dot-blot results for the tissue-culture-origin vaccine, egg-origin vaccine, Ont 1598 field isolate, and virulent strain were 0.00, 0.16, 0.39, and 0.24, respectively, for pharyngeal samples and 0.19, 0.29, 0.58, and 0.48, respectively, for conjunctival samples |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0005-2086 1938-4351 |
DOI: | 10.2307/1592067 |