Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs
A common problem associated with single tooth implant restorations is abutment screw loosening. Manufacturers of implants have attempted to overcome this problem by incorporating antirotational design characteristics into their systems. Micromovement and torque levels required to loosen abutment scr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1995-09, Vol.74 (3), p.270-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A common problem associated with single tooth implant restorations is abutment screw loosening. Manufacturers of implants have attempted to overcome this problem by incorporating antirotational design characteristics into their systems. Micromovement and torque levels required to loosen abutment screws for straight and angled antirotational screw-retained abutment/implant combinations from three different manufactures were examined in this in vitro investigation. A custom-built machine was used and each sample was subjected to compressive horizontal reciprocal movements over a 25-degree incline for a simulated 1-month period. Data were generated that showed movements of the crown/abutment complex during force application. The amount of torque necessary to loosen the abutment screws before and after testing was also recorded and compared for each system. The results indicated no significant differences (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80134-9 |