Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients referred because of suspected coronary artery disease

To determine whether dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides prognostic information beyond that available from routine clinical data, we reviewed the outcome of 210 consecutive patients referred for DSE to evaluate chest pain, perioperative risk, and myocardial viability. Dobutamine was in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1995-11, Vol.76 (12), p.887-891
Hauptverfasser: Kamaran, Mohammed, Teague, Steven M., Finkelhor, Robert S., Dawson, Neal, Bahler, Robert C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine whether dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides prognostic information beyond that available from routine clinical data, we reviewed the outcome of 210 consecutive patients referred for DSE to evaluate chest pain, perioperative risk, and myocardial viability. Dobutamine was infused in increments of 10 μg/kg/min in 5-minute stages to a maximum of 40 μg/kg/min. The dobutamine stress echocardiogram was considered abnormal only if dobutamine induced a new wall motion abnormality as determined by review of the digitized echocardiographic images in a quad screen format and on videotape. Thirty percent of tests were abnormal. An abnormal test was more common (p ≤ 0.02) in men and patients with angina pectoris, in patients taking nitrate therapy, or those with prior myocardial infarction or abnormal left ventricular wall motion at rest. Twenty-two deaths, 17 of which were cardiac, occurred over a median follow-up of 240 days (range 30 to 760). Sixteen cardiac deaths occurred in the 63 patients with versus 1 cardiac death among the 147 without a new wall motion abnormality (p ≤ 0.0001). Other variables associated with cardiac death (p ≤ 0.05) were age >65 years, nitrate therapy, ventricular ectopy during DSE, suspected angina pectoris, and hospitalization at the time of DSE. When cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures were all considered as adverse outcomes, a new wall motion abnormality continued to be the most powerful predictor of an adverse cardiac event. We conclude that DSE provides greater prognostic information than that available from clinical data in a population known or suspected to have coronary artery disease and unable to exercise.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80255-0