Comparison of Single-Tracer (Technetium-99m-Sestamibi) and Dual-Tracer (Thallium-201 Chloride and Technetium-99m-Sestamibi) Protocols for Identification of Myocardial Ischemia

BACKGROUND.The objective of this study was to determine if dual-tracer protocol using thallium-201 (T1) chloride for rest and technetium-99m (Tc)-sestamibi for stress images (T1-MIBI) detects ischemia better than single-tracer protocol using Tc-sestamibi for both rest and stress (MIBI) myocardial perfusion images. METHODS AND RESULTS.A total of 460 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) were included in the study, with 230 (50%) undergoing single-tracer MIBI protocol and 230 (50%) undergoing dual-tracer T1-MIBI protocol. Patient demographics were matched, and the proportion of patients having treadmill stress or dipyridamole stress was similar between the two groups. Stress and rest single photon emission computed tomographic images were recorded in all patients and dual-tracer T1 and Tc-sestamibi (T1-MIBI) perfusion images were acquired separately. The scintigraphic images were analyzed visually, and a semiquantitative method of scoring reversible ischemia was used. Patients’ reversibility scores in each group were compiled (ischemia index) and compared to determine the relative ability of each protocol in identifying ischemia. CONCLUSION.The frequency of ischemia and ischemia index was found to be significantly (P