Interval mammography after needle localization biopsy of breast abnormalities that are pathologically benign
Background: Needle localization biopsy is commonly performed for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities. Routine specimen radiography is generally recommended, but the value of routine short-interval postbiopsy mammography has not been analyzed. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospectiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1995-10, Vol.170 (4), p.323-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Needle localization biopsy is commonly performed for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities. Routine specimen radiography is generally recommended, but the value of routine short-interval postbiopsy mammography has not been analyzed.
Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective review of 299 consecutive localized biopsies in 286 women from March 1989 to November 1993. Of these biopsies, 217 form the basis for this study; all yielded a benign pathologic diagnosis and had both specimen radiography and 3-month interval mammograms performed.
Results: A total of 192 (88%) of postbiopsy mammograms were interpreted as negative, while 22 (10%) were suspicious. Three patients had second biopsies and all had benign diagnoses, 16 had follow-up mammograms that were interpreted as normal or stable, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. A suspicious postbiopsy mammogram had no significant relationship to initial mammographic abnormality or pathologic diagnosis, but did correlate with specimen radiograph interpretation (
P = 0.02 by chi-square comparison).
Conclusions: In a series of needle localization biopsies with intraoperative specimen radiography, postbiopsy mammography failed to reveal any missed cancers. Short-interval follow-up mammography is unnecessary to assess for residual abnormalities when specimen radiography confirms excision of the abnormality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80297-9 |