Current indications for axillounifemoral and axillobifemoral bypass grafts

Revascularization of the lower extremities may require an axillofemoral bypass when an aortobifemoral bypass is contraindicated. Thirty-one patients underwent axillounifemoral and 59 had an axillobifemoral bypass, with a mortality rate of 9%. The indication for operation was limb salvage in 67%, intra-abdominal sepsis in 21%, and disabling claudication in 12%. Cumulative survival, patency, and limb salvage rates were determined by life-table analysis. The cumulative patency and limb salvage rates (with standard errors) at 3 years were 68% ± 8% and 78% ± 9%, respectively. When stratified for type of operation, axillobifemoral bypass had a superior patency rate compared with axillounifemoral bypass (log rank = 3.882, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference when patients were stratified for diabetes (log rank = 2.213, p = no significance [NS]), operative indication (disabling claudication vs. limb salvage) (log rank = 0.0005, p = NS), or outflow (no profundaplasty vs. profundaplasty) (log rank = 2.011, p = NS). We conclude that axillofemoral bypass is a reasonable alternative for revascularization in high-risk patients or in those patients in whom a transabdominal approach is contraindicated. We recommend aggressive use of the profunda femoris artery when the superficial femoral artery is occluded to achieve optimal results.