Family diagnoses missed on a clinical inpatient service
Methods for taking family psychiatric histories have been developed primarily for research rather than clinical settings. The authors compared family histories obtained independently by a research team and by PGY-3 residents on 52 consecutively admitted adult psychiatric inpatients. In contrast to t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychiatry 1987-05, Vol.144 (5), p.630-632 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Methods for taking family psychiatric histories have been developed
primarily for research rather than clinical settings. The authors compared
family histories obtained independently by a research team and by PGY-3
residents on 52 consecutively admitted adult psychiatric inpatients. In
contrast to the residents, the research team used a family tree, screening
questions, and a structured interview based on diagnostic criteria and
identified more than four times as many diagnoses in relatives as did the
residents. The results demonstrate that a family history strategy derived
from research methodology significantly enhances the gathering of important
diagnostic information in a clinical inpatient setting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-953X 1535-7228 |
DOI: | 10.1176/ajp.144.5.630 |