Visual responses and connectivity in the turtle pretectum

T. X. Fan, A. E. Weber, G. E. Pickard, K. M. Faber and M. Ariel Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Saint Louis University, Missouri 63104, USA. 1. Using an isolated turtle brain preparation, we made extracellular spike recordings in the dorsal midbrain during visual stimulation. Single units were isolated by their response to a slow-moving full-field visual pattern imaged on the contralateral retina. This stimulus elicits responses from the basal optic nucleus (BON) and the cerebellar cortex using a similar preparation. Direction and speed tuning were then analyzed, as well as the size and position of the receptive field. 2. In one brain stem region, anterior to the optic tectum and deep to the dorsal surface, all of the visually responsive neurons were direction sensitive (DS) to contralateral retinal stimulation. The location and properties of these cells indicate that they are in the mesencephalic lentiform nucleus (nLM). Anterograde transport of intravitreally injected horseradish peroxidase revealed that this pretectal nucleus receives direct input from the contralateral eye. 3. All but 2 of the 48 cells of the nLM were strongly DS. The most effective stimulus was a slowly moving complex visual pattern that drifted nasally in the contralateral visual field. Brief flashes of spots, patterns, or diffuse light were much less effective. Receptive fields were large and usually (9 of 13 cells) centered in the superior visual field near the horizon and nasal to the blind spot. 4. The visual responses of nLM cells were compared to those of cells in the superficial layers of the optic tectum. In contrast to nLM, the responses of tectal cells were heterogeneous and frequently not DS. Neither tectum or nLM cells had much spontaneous spike activity during darkness or stationary patterns. On the other hand, visual responses of nLM cells were very similar to those of the BON, where neurons also had low spontaneous activity, preferred slow-moving patterns, and were DS. However, nLM and BON exhibit different distributions of preferred directions. Most nLM cells preferred temporal-to-nasal motion, whereas BON cells preferred almost any direction, although few preferred the nasal direction. nLM cell responses were not affected by removal of the ventral brain stem including the BON. 5. The visual properties of nLM cells recorded in vitro were very similar to those that were recorded in intact turtles.