Estrous and litter traits in gilts altered by altrenogest, flushing and pubertal status

Influences of estrous synchronization with altrenogest and flushing on reproductive traits in gilts were evaluated in three experiments on two farms. Crossbred gilts were fed altrenogest or altrenogest and an additional 1.55 kg ground sorghum grain for at least 10 d before breeding (flushing), or se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 1987-04, Vol.64 (4), p.1117-1126
Hauptverfasser: Davis, D.L, Stevenson, J.S, Pollmann, D.S, Allee, G.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Influences of estrous synchronization with altrenogest and flushing on reproductive traits in gilts were evaluated in three experiments on two farms. Crossbred gilts were fed altrenogest or altrenogest and an additional 1.55 kg ground sorghum grain for at least 10 d before breeding (flushing), or served as controls. Additional grain for the flushing treatment was provided to gilts from the eighth day of altrenogest treatment until they were detected in estrus. The combination of altrenogest and flushing (on Farm A) increased (P less than .05) litter size when compared with gilts treated only with altrenogest and controls that received neither altrenogest nor flushing. This response was entirely among gilts inseminated at their pubertal estrus. For pubertal gilts fed altrenogest and the flushing treatment, litter traits were similar to other treated or control gilts inseminated at a postpubertal estrus. No treatment effects on litter size were detected for gilts inseminated at a postpubertal estrus. Gilts on Farm B responded differently, with larger litter sizes (P = .08) for those treated with altrenogest and flushing plus altrenogest than for control gilts. Reasons for farm differences might be unidentified genetic or management factors or different seasons of the year when gilts were treated on Farm B (summer) vs Farm A (fall, winter and spring). Our results indicate a marked potential for increasing litter size in gilts mated at their pubertal estrus because their unstimulated ovulation rate (no altrenogest or flushing) did not challenge adequately the biological capacity of their uteri.
ISSN:0021-8812
1525-3163
DOI:10.2527/jas1987.6441117x