Urinary protein/creatinine ratio as an indicator of allograft function following live related donor renal transplantation

In a study of 656 urine specimens from 53 consecutive recipients of live related donor renal allografts we found an excellent correlation between the protein content of 24-h urines and protein/creatinine ratio (Up/Ucr) in overnight urine samples. Using this ratio, we evaluated proteinuria up to 180...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinica chimica acta 1987-02, Vol.163 (1), p.51-61
Hauptverfasser: SRI KRISHNA, K, PANDEY, A. P, KIRUBAKARAN, M. G, KANAGASABAPATHY, A. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a study of 656 urine specimens from 53 consecutive recipients of live related donor renal allografts we found an excellent correlation between the protein content of 24-h urines and protein/creatinine ratio (Up/Ucr) in overnight urine samples. Using this ratio, we evaluated proteinuria up to 180 days after renal transplantation (overnight urine samples analysed, n = 2745). Heavy proteinuria in the immediate post-operative period had no prognostic significance. Eighty-nine percent of all clinically observed acute rejection episodes were accompanied by an increase over baseline of Up/Ucr; in 56.5% of these episodes elevation of Up/Ucr preceded that of serum creatinine. However, as a marker of rejection the usefulness of this parameter was limited owing to large number of false positive elevations. In 50 recipients whose grafts survived for more than 3 mth, proteinuria was graded into minimal, moderate and heavy. Renal function at the end of six months was good in all patients who exhibited proteinuria with Up/Ucr less than 100 mg/mmol creatinine. Persistent proteinuria with Up/Ucr above 100 mg/mmol preceded significant deterioration of graft function. Therefore, a protein-creatinine ratio of 100 mg/mmol can be considered as an apparent cut-off to differentiate stable from deteriorating graft function in long term evaluation of transplant recipients.
ISSN:0009-8981
1873-3492
DOI:10.1016/0009-8981(87)90033-7