An evaluation of the low-pH enzymatic assay of urinary d-glucaric acid, and its use as a marker of enzyme induction in exocrine pancreatic disease
We have evaluated a low-pH enzymatic method for measuring urinary d-glucaric acid, and its usefulness as a marker of ‘enzyme induction’ in patients with exocrine pancreatic disease. The coefficient of variation lay between 7.5 and 10.9% for within-batch precision, and between 7.9 and 19.8% for betwe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinica chimica acta 1987-02, Vol.162 (3), p.245-256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We have evaluated a low-pH enzymatic method for measuring urinary
d-glucaric acid, and its usefulness as a marker of ‘enzyme induction’ in patients with exocrine pancreatic disease. The coefficient of variation lay between 7.5 and 10.9% for within-batch precision, and between 7.9 and 19.8% for between-batch precision. The useful range of the method was 20–200 μmol/l, with a lower detection limit of 11 μmol/l. The molar concentration ratio of
d-glucaric acid to creatinine in urine correlated with the 8-h output of
d-glucaric acid (
p < 0.005): both indices were significantly higher in a group of 29 patients with exocrine pancreatic disease than in controls (median ratios 4.6 and 2.9 × 10
−3,
p < 0.005; median outputs 14.0 and 8.8 μmol/8 h, respectively,
p < 0.005). Comparison with the results of theophylline tests in the same group of patients showed that whereas 72% of patients had theophylline clearances higher than the highest value in controls, 45% of the group had increased
d-glucaric acid/creatinine ratios, whilst only 21% had increased outputs of
d-glucaric acid. Paradoxically, in patients with established liver disease in whom drug metabolism was impaired urinary
d-glucaric acid values were amongst the highest encountered in the study. Thus, the obvious advantages of the method — non-invasive, simple, reproducible, inexpensive, easily applied to out-patients — are offset by an unacceptably low predictive value as an indicator of microsomal ‘enzyme induction’. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-8981 1873-3492 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90044-1 |