Electron beam therapy is not inferior to superficial x-ray therapy in the treatment of skin carcinoma
Purpose : To compare recurrence rates and cosmetic results after electron beam therapy vs. superficial x-ray therapy for nonmelanoma skin carcinoma. Methods and Materials : A retrospective analysis was performed on 389 histologically confirmed basal cell and squamous cell cell carcinomas of teh skin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 1995-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1347-1350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
: To compare recurrence rates and cosmetic results after electron beam therapy vs. superficial x-ray therapy for nonmelanoma skin carcinoma.
Methods and Materials
: A retrospective analysis was performed on 389 histologically confirmed basal cell and squamous cell cell carcinomas of teh skin, treated with either superficial x-rays or electron beam therapy, with regard to local control rates and cosmetics, as scored with an arbitrary three-point scale.
Results
: The overall local recurrence rate was 4.9 (19 out of 389). For small tumors (irradiated surfaces ≤ 10 cm
2) a local recurrence rate of 2.2% was observed, both after electron beam therapy and after superficial x-ray therapy. Tumor size and previous treatment proved to be important prognostic factors with regard to control rate. The well-fractionated electron beam therapy yielded better cosmetic results than the large fraction surperficial x-ray therapy.
Conclusion
: Electron beam treatment is not inferior to superficial x-ray treatment and even better for larger tumors. The inferior results of electron beam therapy reported in literature might be due to technical factors, which are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
DOI: | 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00603-I |