HDLs containing apolipoproteins A-I and A-II (LpA-I:A-II) as markers of coronary artery disease in men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Abnormalities in HDL and an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) coexist in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). HDLs can be separated by their apolipoprotein (apo) content into particles containing apoA-I but not apoA-II (LpA-I) and those containing both apoA-I and apoA-II (L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1995-08, Vol.92 (3), p.364-370
Hauptverfasser: SYVÄNNE, M, KAHRI, J, VIRTANEN, K. S, TASKINEN, M.-R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abnormalities in HDL and an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) coexist in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). HDLs can be separated by their apolipoprotein (apo) content into particles containing apoA-I but not apoA-II (LpA-I) and those containing both apoA-I and apoA-II (LpA-I:A-II). The LpA-I particles have been suggested to be more effective in conferring protection against CAD than the LpA-I:A-II particles. However, data are sparse, and no studies have defined the role of these two classes of particles in NIDDM. LpA-I and LpA-I:A-II particles were quantified by a differential electroimmunoassay in four groups of men with similar age and body mass index (BMI) distributions. Group 1 consisted of 50 patients with NIDDM and angiographically verified CAD; group 2, 50 men with CAD but no diabetes; group 3, 50 men with NIDDM but no CAD; and group 4, 31 healthy men. Serum apoA-I and apoA-II concentrations were measured by immunoturbidimetry, and HDL2 and HDL3 were separated by ultracentrifugation. Concentrations of LpA-I:A-II particles in group 1 were 13.8%, 18.3%, and 26.9% lower than in groups 2 through 4, respectively. In a two-by-two factorial ANOVA, adjusted for age and BMI, the differences were significant for both CAD (P < .001) and NIDDM (P < .001), with no interaction between the factors. These results were confirmed by comparable differences in the serum concentrations of apoA-I and apoA-II. LpA-I particles were related to the presence or absence of CAD (P = .013), but the difference was lost in a multivariate analysis. A low HDL3 cholesterol concentration characterized both CAD (P = .002) and NIDDM (P = .024). HDL2 cholesterol differed significantly with regard to the presence of NIDDM (P = .033) but only borderline with respect to CAD (P = .073). ApoA-II-containing lipoproteins and HDL3 cholesterol are powerful markers of CAD in men with NIDDM.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.92.3.364