Transportation of curved canals prepared with canal master U, canal master U niti, and stainless steel K-type files

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare root canal configuration after preparation with three different hand instruments and techniques: the canal master U preparation technique (Brasseler, Savannah, GA.), using stainless steel or nickel-titanium canal master U instruments, and the step-back technique using precurved conventional stainless steel K-type files. Sixty-three simulated curved canals were divided in three groups of 21 each. Each group was prepared using one of the three instruments. Comparison of root canal configuration was evaluated with pre- and postoperative photographs that measured the difference in canal diameter and the mesial and distal transportation of the canal walls at the canal length and at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 mm coronal to the canal length. Data obtained were analyzed statistically using an analysis of variance. Instrument breakage was also recorded. Results showed that the final diameter of the prepared canals as well as canal transportation were significantly different between both canal master U instruments and the stainless steek K file. Three stainless steel canal master U instruments separated during instrumentation whereas none in the nickel-titanium canal master U and stainless steel K-type file groups separated. The results of this study show that the canal master U instruments and technique provide a better canal configuration than K files using the step-back technique and that the nickel-titanium canal master U and stainless steel K-type file offers a greater safety factor against breakage than the stainless steel canal master U.