Impaired renal autoregulatory ability in dogs with reduced renal mass

In normal dogs, the renal autoregulatory mechanism limits the effect of changes in renal arterial pressure (RAP) on RBF, renal outer cortical blood flow (OCBF), and GFR by adjusting the vascular tone of the preglomerular arterioles. To determine the extent to which autoregulatory ability was impaire...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 1995-04, Vol.5 (10), p.1768-1774
Hauptverfasser: Brown, S A, Finco, D R, Navar, L G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In normal dogs, the renal autoregulatory mechanism limits the effect of changes in renal arterial pressure (RAP) on RBF, renal outer cortical blood flow (OCBF), and GFR by adjusting the vascular tone of the preglomerular arterioles. To determine the extent to which autoregulatory ability was impaired in remnant renal tissue in dogs, the effects of variations in RAP on RBF, OCBF, and GFR were studied after sham-operation (Group 1; N = 5), 3/4 nephrectomy (Group 2; N = 5), or 7/8 nephrectomy (Group 3; N = 5). In Group 1, the RBF, OCBF, and GFR were not significantly affected by variations in RAP between 75 and 125 mm Hg, indicating intact renal autoregulatory ability. In contrast, both groups of partially nephrectomized dogs exhibited a loss of renal autoregulatory ability below 100 mm Hg (P < 0.05). As RAP rose above 100 mm Hg, dogs with 7/8 nephrectomy exhibited a greater increase than control dogs in RBF (0.586 +/- 0.211 versus -0.080 +/- 0.030 percent change in RBF/mm Hg change in RAP; P < 0.05), OCBF (0.408 +/- 0.157 versus -0.059 +/- 0.054 percent change in RBF/mm Hg change in RAP; P < 0.05), and GFR (0.784 +/- 0.230 versus 0.134 +/- 0.049 percent change in RBF/mm Hg change in RAP; P < 0.05). The ability of the renal vasculature to maintain renal function stable above 100 mm Hg was intermediate in Group 2 and not significantly different from corresponding values for Group 1.
ISSN:1046-6673
DOI:10.1681/ASN.V5101768