Cryptococcal Disease of the CNS in Immunocompetent Hosts: Influence of Cryptococcal Variety on Clinical Manifestations and Outcome

We performed a retrospective review of cases of cerebral cryptococcosis among patients admitted to 12 Australian teaching hospitals between 1985 and 1992. Of 118 cases identified, 35 occurred in immunocompetent hosts. When cases due to Cryptococcus neoformans variety neoformans were compared with th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 1995-03, Vol.20 (3), p.611-616
Hauptverfasser: Mitchell, David H., Sorrell, Tania C., Allworth, Anthony M., Heath, Christopher H., McGregor, Alastair R., Papanaoum, Kelly, Richards, Michael J., Gottlieb, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We performed a retrospective review of cases of cerebral cryptococcosis among patients admitted to 12 Australian teaching hospitals between 1985 and 1992. Of 118 cases identified, 35 occurred in immunocompetent hosts. When cases due to Cryptococcus neoformans variety neoformans were compared with those due to Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii, we found that the latter tended to occur in healthy hosts whose residence or job was located in a rural area, and cerebral mass lesions and/or hydrocephalus and pulmonary mass lesions were more common. For a subgroup of patients with infection due to C. neoformans variety gattii, multiple enhancing lesions were observed on cerebral computed tomograms, and papilledema, high CSF and serum cryptococcal antigen titers, and a worse prognosis (despite prolonged amphotericin B therapy and intraventricular shunt insertion) were also noted. No significant difference in clinical course or outcome in terms of variety of C. neoformans was noted for patients with cryptococcal meningitis whose computed tomographic scans appeared normal on presentation.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/clinids/20.3.611